Eve Kosofsky Sedgewick
1.
Between Men
a.
Patterns of male relationships, including
friendship and heterosexuality and homosexuality, are linked to class and
require relational women and gender systems to be understood.
b.
Male homosocial desire is used to
describe social bonds between members of the same sex.
i. It is a new word with clear analogy to homosexuality.
ii. The word describes male bonding, which may be formed on
homophobia.
iii. To consider homosocial in context with desire and the
potentially erotic is to suggest a continuum between homosocial and
homosexuality.
iv. The continuum is not recognized or visible to men.
v. Homsociality refers to the social structures of
relationships between men.
c.
The term desire will be used to
reference the erotic as desire refers to the libido and it is the best
descriptor to reflect the force that forms important relationships.
d.
The male is selected for the topic as
the essay explores:
i. What shapes sexuality.
ii. What counts as sexuality, and
iii. And both require the affect of historical power
relationships.
1.
Distinctions in power structures
between men and women facilitate differences in gender and prohibit the nature
of this essay.
iv. Does “men-loving-men” and
“men-promoting-the-interests-of-men” have the same meaning as it does for
women?
1.
No.
2.
There are suggestions that “obligatory
heterosexuality” and homophobia are built into and necessary for patriarchal
institutions.
3.
The oppression of homosexuality is part
of the same system that oppresses women.
v. Homophobia and persecution are not arbitrary, but interwoven
with family, gender, age, class, and race relations.
1.
Society could not function in the same
fashion without homophobia.
vi. Suggests corollaries between the Greeks homosexuality and
the mentorship of young boys.
1.
Also mentions labor was conducted by
slaves and women that may have impacted traditional classifications of frowning
on the laborer.
2.
The example suggests heterosexuality is
necessary for the patriarchy, but not necessarily homophobia.
3.
The continuum of homesociality and
homosexuality was seamless, visible and accepted.
vii. Studies have reflected that homosocial continuums are
culturally constructed and not based on gender.
viii.
Historical and literary importance
arises as notions on homosocial continuums are needed for the practical
politics of the gay movement.
2.
Epistemology of the Closet
a.
Axiom 2: The study of sexuality is not
coextensive with the study of gender; correspondingly, anti-homophobic inquiry
is not coextensive with feminist inquiry.
But we can’t know in advance how they will be different.
b.
Understanding of sex and gender has
been a most influential and successful undertaking of the feminist movement.
i. Sex is the difference in chromosomes between people: XX and XY.
ii. Gender is the social constructs of reproduction, identities
and behavior based from the “raw material” of sex.
iii. Gender is the cultural binary view of male and female.
iv. Sex is based in biological and fixed, and gender is based in
social constructs are mutable and variable.
c.
The term sex is socially used to extend
to gender, expectations, narratives, pleasures, identity formations and
knowledge.
d.
Freud and Foucault suggested sexuality
is not based on “sex.”
e.
The issue with discourse on sex/gender
systems is that the term sex encompasses gender from the social to the sexual.
f.
Reference to Gayle Rubin that sex and
gender are related, but they are not the same thing.
g.
The hypothesis of the essay is that sex
and gender are distinct in the same manner as class and race, or sex and race.
h.
Gender differences are important as
gender distinctions are relational in degrees: the male and the female and
variances in between.
i.
Not all oppressions are the same. As such, it might not be appropriate to ask
feminist studies to speak to the newly created field of gay studies.
j.
Dichotomized ideology that people are
all male or all female limits the understanding of gender studies.
k.
That sexual preference is perceived as
a choice lends difficulties to a discourse of gender studies.
l.
A condensation of “sexual theory” into
“gay/lesbian theory” in line with the language of “sexual orientation” and
“gender object choice” clearly demonstrates that any discourse is skewed
history.
Works Cited
Sedgewick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch et al. 2nd ed. New York: W.W.Norton &
Co., 2010. 2466-2470. Print.
---. Epistemology of the Closet. The
Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch et al. 2nd ed. New York: W.W.Norton &
Co., 2010. 2470-2477. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment