Judith Butler
1.
Gender Trouble
a.
From the Preface.
i. Masculinity is dependent on the female mysteriousness, or
Hegel’s “Other.”
1.
This link demonstrates that men are not
autonomous from women.
2.
Observation of power reveals it is more
than exchange or a relation between men and women.
3.
Observation reveals that power is
formed through the binary thinking about gender.
ii. Butler questions thought on gender.
1.
What do the terms “men” and “women”
mean?
2.
What restrictions are in play?
3.
Is it an uncomfortable question as the
terms conform to heterosexual notions and understandings about gender and
desire?
4.
What happens to thought on these issues
when taken out of the domination of heterosexual ideology?
5.
Do these notions apply to other binary
pairs associated with other categories of identity?
iii. Answers can be investigated through Foucault and Nietzsche’s
“Genealogy.”
1.
The investigation will not look for
origin or truths on sexuality.
2.
The investigation will look into what
is at political stake that effect sexuality.
3.
The investigation will focus and
challenge “phallogocentrism” and “compulsory heterosexuality.”
iv. Chapter 3. Subversive Bodily Acts.
1.
Categories of true sex, discrete
gender, and specific sexuality have constituted the stable point of reference
for feminist theory and politics.
a.
These notions of identity have served
as foundations for theory that drives and forms politics.
b.
Does the fixed notion of gender, and
compulsory behavior, determine the shape of politics, or does politics create
political forces that determine notions of gender?
2.
Conventional thought directly
associates the human body with gender.
a.
Foucault said that genealogy is to “to
expose a body totally imprinted by history.”
b.
History is the creation of values and
meanings by a signifying practice that requires the subjection of the body.
c.
Foucault and Nietzsche thought cultural
values emerge as the result of their effect on the body that is sublimated into
a domain of values.
d.
An analogy: As history writes to the
body, the body is destroyed and left with values. As the pen writes to paper, the pen is
destroyed and leaves its story.
e.
As the body disappears, culture
remains.
3.
Mary Douglas suggests that the contours
of the body are marked in a way that seeks to establish cultural codes which
creates a nature/culture binary.
a.
The limits of the body are socially
hegemonic.
b.
When someone crosses those limits, they
are perceived as a danger.
c.
AIDS is used as an example. Not only was it considered a threat or a
“gay” disease, the hysterical reporting of it was carried through mainstream
media.
d.
A direct association was formed with
“the body” as the disease was transmitted through bodily fluids.
4.
Douglas suggests that all social
systems are vulnerable at the margins because the dangers exist on the margins.
5.
Discussion on the binary pair “inner”
and “outer.” Both physically and
psychologically.
a.
The binary pair is used together to
stabilize and consolidate the subject.
b.
The question that remains is how does a
particular identity become internalized?
b.
From Interiority to Gender
Performatives
i. Foucault writes that “laws” are not literally
internalized.
ii. “Laws” are incorporated into the self with consequences.
iii. The “laws” are fully manifest, but are not visible (latent).
c.
Inner space is signified as a vital and
sacred enclosure.
d.
The “soul” becomes a surface signification
that reflects the inner psyche on the outside, while perpetually renouncing
itself.
e.
There is a link between the inner
workings of the psyche, pertaining to gender, and how it is displayed on the
outside. The beginnings that
differentiate gender from the outward appearance of the body.
i. Words, acts, gestures and desires produce the internal
workings on the surface of the body through interactions.
ii. They are expressions of the internal psyche expressed on the
outer body.
iii. They are performative and h old no other reality other than
their acts.
iv. A complete inner account of gender is not present, nor is
gender tied to the body.
v. Genders are neither true nor false, but are produced as the
truth effects of a discourse of primary and stable identity.
f.
Cross-dressing, drag and butch give
insights into gender.
i. Drag is associated with anatomy against the performed
gender.
ii. However, there is actually anatomy, gender identity, and
gender performance.
iii. The performance illustrates dissonance between the three.
iv. In essence, drag implicitly reveals the imitative structure
of gender itself.
v. Imitation that mocks the notion of the original tends to
more a sincere representation than a parody.
g.
The body is not a being, but a boundary
that is politically regulated.
i. Gender is a performance with punitive consequences.
ii. People are punished for not doing gender right.
iii. There is no “gender” that gender aspires to be, there is no
essence.
iv. It is the various acts of gender that create the idea of
gender.
v. Gender is a construct that conceals itself.
h.
If gender is act, then it the
production of multiple performances.
i. Gender is not static.
It is prone to shifts and changes.
ii. If gender is created through sustained social performances, then
notions of true male and female gender are also social performances.
i.
Genders can neither be:
i. True or false.
ii. Real or apparent.
iii. Original or derived.
Works Cited
Butler, Judith. Gender
Trouble. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch et al. 2nd ed. New York: W.W.Norton &
Co., 2010. 1261-1265. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment