Discovery

Discovery

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Heidegger - Being with World

Being-in-the-World as Being-With and Being-One’s-Self. The “They”

An approach  to the Existential Question of the “Who” of Dasein.

The I in Dasein is:
  • The I.
    • Who becomes the subject, or the self.
    • Who maintains itself through changes by experience,
      • and ways of behavior.
      • It is the self relative to otherness.

Does giving the “I” this meaning disclose Casein in its everydayness.
  • There is a given unto itself.
    • I am this entity.
      • A specific awareness toward its being.
    • A being without world is never an “is.”
      • World gives it form and proximity.
    • I fails without world,
      • It is unable to stand by itself.
      • I belongs to something present-at-hand
      • Spirit is not a synthesis of should and body,
        • it is existence.

26 - The Casein-With of Others and Everyday Being-with.
  • Still working on answering of the “who” of everyday Dasein.

Analyzing Dasein has to consider a Being that takes its orientation from Being-in-the-World.
  • The world gives it form and presence
  • There are things in the world - With-the World
    • What’s around us is ready-to-hand, or
      • Nature present-at-hand.
  • There are people in the world,
    • But they are not thought of as things,
      • or as nature.
    • But as Beings-in-the-World along side us.

They are the others.
  • Others not meaning everyone else,
    • Those we distinguish from I,
      • Those that overcome and stand out from the I.
    • Others are with us,
      • but with is used existentially, not categorically.
        • ***Note Categorically as noun against existentially as experience *** 
Being in the World - The world that I share with others. 
Dasein - is With World.
Being in - is being with others. 
  • Their being-in-themselves Within-the-world is Daseain-with.
    • The others are beings unto themselves in the world we share,
      • And Dasein-with is being among them.

Dasein encounters people and things environmentally, but
  • It looks away from its own experience, it’s own awareness,
    • in order to apprehend and make decisions about what its going to do.
  • It views itself as I here,
    • but here is not a point.
    • It’s relative to the current environment.
      • It is relative to Dasein’s spatiality

Dasein understands itself proximally in terms of the world.
  • We don’t view others as ready-at-hand, or something to use or make decisions about.
    • We seem them as other beings living along side us.
      • This is Dasein-with, or living in the world with others.
        • Others being distinct from things.
Everyday-Being-Oneself and “They”
We concern ourselves environmentally with things and others by

  • by what they do.
  • They are what they do.

Dasein is with other beings,
  • but it is still itself.
  • It compares itself with others in terms of priority.
  • Others also compare,
    • and claim dispositions on the self.
  • The self stands in subjection to the others.
  • Other beings we recognize as having a disposition about us…
    • “are there.”
    • They are the neuter of “who”
    • They are “the they.”

“They” is a part of our constitutive reality.
  • It needs to be thought of existentially, and not in just a plural.
  • We become part of they
  • We have a they self
    • and an authentic self.

When Dasein discovers something in the world in its own way,
  • it becomes authentic.
  • The authentic-Being-one’s-self is a existential modification of the “They.”

*** Note ***
There is a gap between the authentic self and the I.
  • Both are derived from manifold experience.
  • The authentic self is reflection revealing differences from the they
    • “I” is a reflection and certain self-awareness with attention placed on consciousness.
  • The authentic-self is a mode of discovery.
  • “I” is mode of awareness on the self.
  • With is the mode of awareness of being-with others,
    • and given them the same attributes of consciousness that we have.

*** Note “there” is a plural that does not necessarily speak to proximity.
* We extend “the they” to others not in our present.


Heidegger, Martin. Being-in-the-World as Being-With and Being-One’s-Self. The “They.” The Philosophy of Communication. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2012. Pp 171-187. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment