Being-in-the-World as Being-With and Being-One’s-Self. The “They”
An approach to the Existential Question of the “Who” of Dasein.
The I in Dasein is:
- The I.
- Who becomes the subject, or the self.
- Who maintains itself through changes by experience,
- and ways of behavior.
- It is the self relative to otherness.
Does giving the “I” this meaning disclose Casein in its everydayness.
- There is a given unto itself.
- I am this entity.
- A specific awareness toward its being.
- A being without world is never an “is.”
- World gives it form and proximity.
- I fails without world,
- It is unable to stand by itself.
- I belongs to something present-at-hand
- Spirit is not a synthesis of should and body,
- it is existence.
26 - The Casein-With of Others and Everyday Being-with.
- Still working on answering of the “who” of everyday Dasein.
Analyzing Dasein has to consider a Being that takes its orientation from Being-in-the-World.
- The world gives it form and presence
- There are things in the world - With-the World
- What’s around us is ready-to-hand, or
- Nature present-at-hand.
- There are people in the world,
- But they are not thought of as things,
- or as nature.
- But as Beings-in-the-World along side us.
They are the others.
- Others not meaning everyone else,
- Those we distinguish from I,
- Those that overcome and stand out from the I.
- Others are with us,
- but with is used existentially, not categorically.
- ***Note Categorically as noun against existentially as experience ***
Being in the World - The world that I share with others.
Dasein - is With World.
Being in - is being with others.
- Their being-in-themselves Within-the-world is Daseain-with.
- The others are beings unto themselves in the world we share,
- And Dasein-with is being among them.
Dasein encounters people and things environmentally, but
- It looks away from its own experience, it’s own awareness,
- in order to apprehend and make decisions about what its going to do.
- It views itself as I here,
- but here is not a point.
- It’s relative to the current environment.
- It is relative to Dasein’s spatiality
Dasein understands itself proximally in terms of the world.
- We don’t view others as ready-at-hand, or something to use or make decisions about.
- We seem them as other beings living along side us.
- This is Dasein-with, or living in the world with others.
- Others being distinct from things.
Everyday-Being-Oneself and “They”
We concern ourselves environmentally with things and others by
Dasein is with other beings,
“They” is a part of our constitutive reality.
When Dasein discovers something in the world in its own way,
*** Note ***
There is a gap between the authentic self and the I.
*** Note “there” is a plural that does not necessarily speak to proximity.
* We extend “the they” to others not in our present.
We concern ourselves environmentally with things and others by
- by what they do.
- They are what they do.
Dasein is with other beings,
- but it is still itself.
- It compares itself with others in terms of priority.
- Others also compare,
- and claim dispositions on the self.
- The self stands in subjection to the others.
- Other beings we recognize as having a disposition about us…
- “are there.”
- They are the neuter of “who”
- They are “the they.”
“They” is a part of our constitutive reality.
- It needs to be thought of existentially, and not in just a plural.
- We become part of they
- We have a they self
- and an authentic self.
When Dasein discovers something in the world in its own way,
- it becomes authentic.
- The authentic-Being-one’s-self is a existential modification of the “They.”
*** Note ***
There is a gap between the authentic self and the I.
- Both are derived from manifold experience.
- The authentic self is reflection revealing differences from the they
- “I” is a reflection and certain self-awareness with attention placed on consciousness.
- The authentic-self is a mode of discovery.
- “I” is mode of awareness on the self.
- With is the mode of awareness of being-with others,
- and given them the same attributes of consciousness that we have.
*** Note “there” is a plural that does not necessarily speak to proximity.
* We extend “the they” to others not in our present.
Heidegger, Martin. Being-in-the-World as Being-With and Being-One’s-Self. The “They.” The Philosophy of Communication. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2012. Pp 171-187. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment