Week 4
Radford writes that we process information by sensing our
world, and then mentally organizing the sensations into long-term memory. Sensory memory is brief, and it is
associated with satisfying our primary drives.
Short-term memory is the association of sensory memory and consciousness. It is the way station between sensory and
long-term memory. Long-term memory
establishes meaning through classification and differentiation and it serves as
the forge of knowledge.
In short, information processing is how we organize and
construct our world. Information
processing uses conscious experience, the unconscious, and numerous cultural
and personal filters to form meaning and relationships.
An article from last week explains Kant’s position nicely. Sartre was contrasting Husserl and Hegel’s
position that our being is alone and everything else, including other people,
is only knowledge, or information (Sartre).
I believe Hegel’s position was derived specifically from Kant. Heidegger believed in being-with and that
people could realize others with equal existence because we were part of the
same world. Information Processing and
Kant suggest our being is the only thing we recognize as real, and everything
is derived from knowledge. If I understand
correctly, we can’t see beyond ourselves because nothing else is real; it’s
only information.
I don’t necessarily agree with Kant, but his thoughts became
revelatory when I stepped into the argument. If our world is based on information that is
processed through filters, then we can redirect our input sensors and hone our
filters to create more meaningful information.
If our primary drives motivate our sensory explorations,
then I ask if it’s possible to inform our drives, or our unconscious, to seek
out new or alternate sensory experiences.
If short-term memory is associated with consciousness, then
I ask how can we modify or enhance our awareness to intensify encounters in an
effort to fully realize long-term memory.
If long-term memory is derived from classification and
differentiation, then I would ask what is the impact to the formation of
meaning when we increase our mental diversity by exploring and accruing
alternate points of view.
The unconscious is considered something that lies below or
something that works independent from our conscious. It is associated with our primary drives and
a motivator that guides us. I view the
unconscious as a collection of alternate modes of thought that can be tapped
and informed. My creative side has found
a rather active unconscious that speaks quite clearly when I quite my mind
during encounters. I’m not saying I
understand it or can articulate it, but its impacts are becoming more positive
the more I let go an use it.
References
Radford, G.P. (2005). On
the Philosophy of Communication. South Bank, Vic., Australia: Thomson
Wadsworth.
Sartre, J.P. (2004) “Husserl,
Hegel, Heidegger.” In D.K. Keenan. Hegel and Contemporary Continental
Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment