Benjamin,
Walter
1.
“The
Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility”
a.
It
has taken a long time for the conditions of production to be manifested in all
areas of culture.
i. As it has taken time,
only now can the changes be evaluated.
ii. Wants to identify how
art is produced under the new system.
1.
The
cause for change, or the reasons for change, is present in the superstructure
and the economy.
2.
As
such, the reasons are also present in the political structure that has
significant effect.
3.
They
neutralize ideas such as creativity, genius, and mystery.
iii. This work is a
comparison of the traditional views of art versus art for fascism.
iv. Reproduction of art has
always been reproducible.
1.
Only
a few types of objects could be reproduced.
2.
Technology
increased:
a.
The
scope of the number of items that can be reproduced,
b.
To
what quality, and
c.
To
what quantity.
3.
By
1900, reproduction of all known works of art could be reproduced.
a.
It
modified their effect, and
b.
Became
an artistic process in and of itself.
v. An original has
uniqueness and history.
1.
Technological
reproductions:
a.
Is
independent than manual reproduction,
b.
It
can be distributed endlessly. The
original can only be in one place at one given time. Reproductions can be many places.
c.
It
substitutes uniqueness for mass production, or
d.
It
detaches the work from the sphere of tradition.
vi. Originals can change
over time.
1.
In
the form of Decay.
2.
In
the form of social changes in perception.
3.
These
ideas make up an originals aura.
vii. An original by its aura
can be understood through time, decay, and social perceptions.
viii.
The
aura is destroyed as:
1.
People
increasingly want to be close to a thing, that in effect,
2.
Strips
the original of its uniqueness.
ix. The unique value of the
authentic work of art has its basis in ritual, the source of its original use
value.
1.
This
connection is being lost.
2.
Art
is being produced for reproducibility.
3.
The
basis of art is switching from ritual to politics.
x. Originals have two types
of characters that are opposites.
1.
There
is a cult value that limits access to an original.
2.
There
is exhibition value.
3.
Reproduction
shifts cult value to exhibition value.
Shifts the creation of magic feel to just a work of art feel.
4.
Artistic
value is seen as incidental.
5.
Exhibition
value assaults cult value, but cult value has a refuge in human
countenance. Human expression gives
photographs their melancholy and incomparable beauty.
6.
An
example of exhibition being positive.
xi. Films.
1.
Significant
difference between actors acting before people versus an apparatus (camera).
a.
The
actor is performing for a piece of equipment.
b.
The
actor loses his aura as the aura is attached to the here and now.
i. The actor’s performance
is not.
c.
The
film actor is a collection of parts that are assembled.
d.
The
film actor is reduced to a prop.
2.
In
the past, there were few performers/writers addressing a large group of
people.
a.
This
has changed through technology.
3.
The
removal of equipment from a film has increased the level of reality and believability.
a.
Traditional
plays had stages, sets, curtains, orchestras where the viewer saw all the
equipment put into the work.
b.
The
removal of the equipment implies reality and the production, or medium, becomes
invisible.
4.
Film
can be used for:
a.
Artistic
purposes and
b.
Scientific
purposes.
i. Provide details and
close ups,
ii. Accentuate hidden
details of familiar objects.
5.
It
has always been one of the primary tasks of art to create a demand whose hour
of full satisfaction has not yet come.
6.
The
masses are a matrix from which all customary behavior toward works of art is
today emerging newborn. Or, attitudes
toward are art are being derived and exploited from the masses.
a.
Requires
little thinking.
b.
Diversion
from life.
c.
Doesn’t
cultivate hope or motivation.
i. Distraction can be
viewed as a habit and become the attitude to which art is directed.
7.
Modern
art and culture are shaping and increasing the size of the masses.
a.
As
the masses become disconnected and streamlined into one culture, they are more
easily managed. More specifically, to
war and whims of the state.
Works Cited
Benjamin,
Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility.” The
Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch et al. 2nd ed. New York: W.W.Norton &
Co., 2010. 1046-1072. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment