Jean
Baudrillard
1.
The Precession of
Simulacra
a.
The
simulacrum is never that which conceals the truth. It is the truth which conceals there is
none. The simulacrum is true.
b.
An
analogy:
i. The notion of a
territory becomes represented by a map.
ii. The map becomes the idea
of a territory.
iii. What is real affects the
territory, not the map.
iv. We are like the
territory, not the map.
v. Modern day imperialists
try to make the real conform with their simulation of the real.
c.
The
age of simulation strips the gaps of imagination.
i. The real is made from
measurements and precision and no longer includes the need for interpretation
during its formation or viewing.
ii. It no longer needs to be
rationalized as there are no measurements to which it needs to be compared.
iii. As there is no need for
imagination, it becomes hyper-real.
d.
A
distinction:
i. Dissimulate – to conceal
what someone has. To conceal what is. Implies an absence.
ii. Simulate – To conceal
what someone does not have. To produce
what is. Implies a presence.
iii. Feigning means
pretending, as pretending to be ill.
Simulating means producing effects, as in producing the real symptoms of
being ill.
iv. Science is unable to
deal with simulation as it can only address the real.
v. We tend to draw away
from determining the real from the symptom.
The person feigning to be mad, is mad as long as they are producing the
symptoms.
e.
What
happens when the divine is simulated.
i. Supreme authority
becomes images or visible theology.
ii. The visible machinery of
icons substitute the intelligent ideas of god.
iii. To some, this
demonstrates a simulation of god that prompts the idea of not god. God is viewed as a simulation, not an
intelligent idea.
iv. It is dangerous to
unmask images, since they dissimulate the fact that there is nothing behind
them.
f.
Behind
the style of images hides the grey eminence of politics.
g.
Western
faith relies on the idea that a sign could refer to depth and meaning.
i. If god can be reduced to
simulation, then god becomes meaningless.
h.
A
distinction:
i. A representation starts
with the idea that the sign and the real are equivalent.
ii. A simulation starts with
the negation of the sign being needed.
1.
The
phases of a simulated image are:
a.
The
image is a reflection of basic reality.
b.
The
image masks and perverts a basic reality.
It is not reality.
c.
The
image masks the absence of a basic reality.
The viewer supplants the image for reality. A reality that is produced.
d.
It
bears no relation to any reality whatever.
Much like the distinction between the map and the territory. The map, in reality, does not accurately
describe the territory, but it is considered the territory. Note – The medium between the concept of a
simulation and the reality becomes invisible, leaving only the simulation.
i.
Science
classifies things. As it does, the
individual object is lost and comes to represent the class. Ethnology example.
i. Science may duplicate
things for viewing and then protect the original.
ii. However, it is a
simulation and the real is removed from view.
iii. The essence of the
original is not present in the simulation, nor is it viewable.
iv. The original is lost.
j.
Using
Disneyland, it is not a question of false representations, but an exclusion, or
concealment, of the rest of the world being real.
Works Cited
Baudrillard,
Jean. The Precession of Simulacra. The
Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism.
Ed. Vincent B. Leitch et al. 2nd
ed. New York: W.W.Norton & Co., 2010. 1553-1566. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment