TIFFIN UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCIENCES
Minimum Course Content Guide
Course Number: COM 631
Course Name: New Media
Prerequisite: None
Course Description: This course examines the origins and
evolution of new media and its social, cultural, legal, and political implications.
From social
media such as Facebook and Twitter, to blogging, Wikipedia, YouTube, smart
phones and tablets, online and new media are changing our culture and society
in significant ways. These commercial,
participatory technologies can empower users, but they also bring with them a
variety of complex issues when it comes to communicating in an increasingly
digital world. As media technologies
evolve, they are producing new contexts for engagement and raising important
questions related to issues such as identity, community, civility, privacy and
freedom of expression.
How people
relate to each other in this electronic environment is changing our culture and
society in ways we are just now beginning to understand. Not just in how we do things, but in how we
create meaning and understand our world. In the process, new media are challenging our
sense of place and the way in which we portray ourselves and perceive others.
Through a
series of readings, online explorations, discussions, interactions and writing
assignments, students will come to understand the characteristics and
implications of new media and their impact on our society.
Goals:
- Develop an understanding
of the origins of new media and the virtual, public spaces it creates.
- Examine, understand and be
able to critique different types of new media and the questions they
raise.
- Understand how and why
people portray themselves online the way they do through social media and
blogs.
- Understand the influence
of commercial interests in the development of new media technologies and
the agendas behind them.
- Be able to critically
evaluate the creation of knowledge and understanding in participatory
media.
- Understand the risks and
benefits of new media use and the impact it can have on personal and
professional life.
- Develop an understanding
of the First Amendment and freedom of expression in the online
environment.
- Become knowledgeable about
the cultural, social, legal and political issues pertaining to privacy,
surveillance, anonymity, copyright, piracy, defamation of character, hate
speech, cyber bullying, indecency and obscenity in the new media
environment.
- Use research skills in
exploring, interacting, and writing about new media.
Evaluations:
Students will be evaluated based on:
Students will be evaluated based on:
The amount and quality of participation in discussions
Analysis and critique of new media artifacts such as
profiles, blogs, YouTube videos and wikis
Short essays
Short essays
Final paper
Online meetings
Minimum Topic
Outline:
·
The history and evolution of new media
·
Online communities and society
·
The emergence of virtual communities
·
Blogs, collaboration and credibility
·
The beginnings of social networking
·
Facebook and identity
·
Participatory media
·
New media and hype
·
YouTube and user-generated content
·
Lessons from Wikipedia
·
Constructing knowledge in an era of wikis
·
New technology, Twitter and tweets
·
Gatekeeping in the digital era
·
Constructing meaning form Internet photo
collections
·
Old law, new technology
Topics
o Blogs and Fog
Finding value in the haze
of blogosphere
o Smile...You’ve been TUBED!
User generated video and
the new media environment
o A crisis in credibility?
Wikipedia, reality, and the
search for truth
o The Interest in Pinterest
People, places and Internet
photo collections
o Me, Myself and I
Shyness, Loneliness and Narcissism on Social Networks
Shyness, Loneliness and Narcissism on Social Networks
o You’re so vain…
Perception, Vanity and Online Personas
Perception, Vanity and Online Personas
o Everybody’s business…
Social Media as Social
Currency
o You’ve been tagged!
You, Facebook and your (potential/former)
employer
o Bullies and Bozos
Cyberbullying
Cyberbullying
o You can’t say that
Censorship and New Media
o You shouldn’t say that
Ethics and Social Media
Ethics and Social Media
o Did I say that? Follow
the breadcrumbs…
Your electronic trail
Your electronic trail
Textbooks and
Readings
Levinson, Paul. (2012). New New Media. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Levinson, Paul. (2012). New New Media. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Rheingold, H. (1993).
The Virtual Community. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Samoriski, J.H. (under revision). Issues
in Cyberspace: Communication, Technology, Law and Society
on
the Internet Frontier. Buckland, MA:
Paideia Publishing.
Kirkpatrick, D. (2010).
The Facebook Effect: The Inside
Story of the Company that is Connecting the
World. New York: Simon & Schuster
Journal Articles
Keren, Michael. (2010). Blogging and Mass Politics. Biography. 33:1.
Armstrong, Cory and
McAdams, Melinda. (2011). Blogging the time away? Young adults’ motivations for blog use.
Atlantic Journal of Communication. 19
113-128.
Lingel, Jessa &
Naaman, Mor. (2011). You should have been there, man: Live music,
DIY content and online
communities. New Media & Society.
14(2).
Maggiore,
Peter. (2012). Viewer discretion is
advised: Disconnects between the marketplace of ideas and social media
used to communicate information during emergencies and public health crises. 18 Mich.
Telecomm. Tech. Law Rev. 667.
Stafford, Tom &
Bell, Vaughan. (2012). Brain network:
Social media and the cognitive scientist. Trends in Cognitive Science. 16(10).
Sundin, Olof. (2010). Janitors of knowledge: Constructing knowledge
in the everyday life of Wikipedia
editors. Journal of Documentation. 67
(5).
Gorgeon, Arnaud
& Swanson, Burton. (2011). Web 2.0 according to Wikipedia: Capturing an organizing vision. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
62(10). 1916-1932.
Zhao, Xiaoli &
Bishop, M.J. (2011). Understanding and supporting online
communities of practice: Lessons
learned from Wikipedia. 59. Education
Tech Research Dev. 711-735.
Francke, Helena
& Sundin, Olof. (2012). Negotiating
the role of sources: Educators’ conceptions of credibility
in participatory media. Library & Information Science Research.
34. 169-175.
Carter, G. &
Arroyo, Sarah. (2011). Tubing the future: Participatory pedagogy and
YouTube U in 2020.
Computers and Composition.
28. 292-302.
Tripp,
Stephanie. (2012). From TVTV to YouTube: A genealogy of
participatory practices in video. Journal
of Film and Video. 64.
Juhasz,
Alexandra. (2009). Learning the five lessons of YouTube: After trying to teach there, I don’t believe
the hype. Cinema Journal 48, No. 2.
145-150.
Jones, J. ,
2011-05-25 "Why Tube? Applying the
Uses and Gratifications Framework to Social Media Production Motives" Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the International Communication
Association, Boston: MA. 2012-06-18
from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p491083_index.html
Kim, J. (2012).
The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media,
Culture and Society 34(1). 53-67.
Lazaroiu,
George. (2011). Conceptualizing gatekeeping in the digital
era. Contemporary
Readings in Law and Social Justice 3(1). 152-159.
Crandall, D. & Snavely,
N. (2012). Modeling people and places with Internet
photo collections. Communications
of the ACM 55(6). 52- 60.
Harrison, T. &
Barthel, B. (2009). Wielding new media
in Web 2.0: Exploring the history of engagement
with the collaborative construction of media products. New
Media & Society 11(1). 155-178.
Boyd, D. &
Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship.
Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
Ryan, T. & Xenos, Sophia. (2011).
Who uses Facebook? An
investigation into the relationship
between the Big
Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers
in Human Behavior. Vol. 27. pp. 1658-1664.
Smith, P. & Kidder, D.
(2010). You’ve been tagged! (then again, maybe not): Employers and
Facebook. Business Horizons. Vol. 53. Pp. 491-499
Kierkegaard, Sylvia.
Twitter thou doeth? Computer Law & Security Review. Vol. 26.
Pp. 577-594
Hanna, R., Rohm, A. et al.
(2011). We’re all connected: The
power of the social media ecosystem.
Business
Horizons. Vol. 54. Pp. 265-273.
Rheingold,
H. (1993) "The Heart of The Well," from The Virtual Community. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
MIT Press.
Beckstrom,
D.C. (2008) Who’s looking at your Facebook profile? The use of student conduct codes to censor college students’ online speech. Willamette
Law Review. Vol. 45. p. 261.
Boyd, D. (2007). Why
youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage
social
life. MacArthur foundation Series on
Digital Learning – Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume (ed. David
Buckingham). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ellison, C., Steinfield, Charles, et al. (2007). The benefits of Facebook
“Friends:” Social capital and
college
students’ use of online social network sites.
Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication. Vol. 12., Issue
4.
Kane, B. (2010).
Balancing anonymity, popularity, & micro-celebrity: The crossroads of social
networking and privacy. Albany
Law Journal of Science and Technology. 20: 327.
Kaupins, G. & Park, S. (2011) Legal and ethical implications of corporate
social networks. Employee
Responsibilities
and Rights Journal. 23:83.
Walker, C., Rajan, B. et al.
(2011). An exploratory study of cyberbullying with undergraduate
university students. Tech Trends. Vol. 44, No. 2.
Fournier, S. & Avery, J. (2011). The uninvited
brand. Business Horizons. Vol. 54.
Pp. 193-207.
Grimmelmann, J. (2009).
Saving Facebook. Iowa Law Review. Vol. 92.
P. 1137.
Carnegie Units
(135 hours):
Activity/Assignment:
|
Minimum Hours
Expected:
|
Reading
|
50
|
Web Explorations (Site critiques, YouTube, wikis)
|
15
|
Online discussion and reaction
|
20
|
Exploratory Essays
|
20
|
Class Live Pro participation
|
5
|
Final Paper: Research & Writing
|
25
|
TOTAL
|
135
|
No comments:
Post a Comment