A Theory of Creativity
Developing a theory of creativity
may seem like a daunting task, but in reality, it is not so difficult. People tend to contextualize creativity with
great discoveries, artistic works and powerful forms of self-expression. However, this is not entirely accurate. Creativity is a system of thought reflective
of our inner nature. Creativity is the
force that forms meaning and relationships, it embraces the vast resources of
the human mind, it is infused by imagination, and most importantly, it is fully
authentic.
Creativity forms meaning through the
processes of recognition and interpretation.
R.W. Gerard would use the terms gestalts and closure (240-243). People tend to view the world with incomplete
information. There is what we can
perceive, the known, and that which is hidden, or the unknown. There is usually enough information that one
can fill in the blanks with assumptions based on past experiences and memories. This is called closure and the process forms gestalts,
or completed ideas of things (Gerard 241).
Rollo May supports this notion, “Incomplete gestalts form whenever we
encounter something we do not understand” (131). A foundational base for a theory suggests
creative acts occur during the formation of meaning, as well as the expression
of ideas. I theorize that highly
creative people tend to slow down the processes of closure and infuse their
imagination during the formation of meaning and expression. I surmise that many of their memories are
infused with creative metaphors that tend to fuel future creative
expressions.
The creative mind can draw from the vast
resources of the human mind. May writes
that the forming and reforming of our world uses the totality of our person
(133). If the totality of the individual
can be used, then one can identify reason, emotion, dream, myth, intuition and
faith as cognitive tools of creation. In
addition, Einstein wrote that he thought in symbols and images (32). This speaks to sensory memories as systems of
thought rather than language. I believe
that thinking, through the use of sensory memory, is part of our everyday
experience, but it is over shadowed by language and conscious thought. This might explain why people have to be
distracted, or achieve subdued states of mind, in order to receive communication
from their deeper selves. I also theorize that communicating to this level
could describe the notions of the collective unconscious. It is not so much we are sharing residual
memories, but we are sharing and accessing more primal modes of communication. I add to my theory that highly creative
people have more access to forms of communication that include sensory memory
and more interpretative tools outside the realms of reason and conscious
thought.
The
forces of imagination and choice seem to determine creative ability and
expression. May wrote, “Imagination is
the key function that participates in the formation of reality” (133). Gerard summarizes that the imagination is
the premise, or the question, and reason forms the conclusion, or the answer
(238). The idea is that how far one is
willing to stretch the imagination, during closure, determines the level of
creative interpretation and expression.
Highly creative people are freer and more willing to stretch their
imagination in their efforts to interpret and describe their world.
The use of the term choice requires
some context. Choice is the central
theme of The Courage to Create (May). May argues that one should choose to act on
life, rather than passively accept one’s circumstances (11). It is reasonable to infer that our attitudes
toward encounters impact the storage of our memories. Again, we find notions speaking to creativity
during observation and interpretation. May
writes to the creative encounter as the start of the creative process
(41). Gerard speaks to observation as
being the tool to reveal understanding (236).
Paul Valery writes that questions spark the creative mind (105). May, Gerard,
and Valery speak to an inquisitive mind seeking the unknown. They speak to a mind that uses discovery as a
way to generate deeper questions of exploration. In this context, choice becomes reflective of
attitude and outlook towards one’s world.
The more one openly and honestly engages with their world seems to
influence their level of creative potential.
Perhaps the most powerful aspect of
any creative theory is the notion of authenticity. Conviction and validation are companions of
deep insight. The subconscious realm is
not inhabited by shades of doubt or abstract negatives. When the unconscious speaks, it speaks to
what it believes to be true. It speaks
to its experiences and its inner nature. Unconscious expression by its nature is
reflective only of itself, and therefore it is completely authentic. Maya Angelou once said, “A bird doesn’t sing
because it has an answer, it sings because it has a song.” Maslow enhances this poetic insight by
writing to the inner nature. He notes
that everyone has an intrinsic nature that seems to be unchanging (3). He writes, “It is weak and delicate and
subtle and easily overcome by habit, cultural pressure, and wrong attitudes
toward it” (4). Unfortunately, cultural
pressures and wrong attitudes towards the individual accurately and
uncomfortably describe our consumer culture.
However, everyone wants to be heard, to be valued and to have a sense of
contribution to something larger.
Creativity is more than the flash of revelation; it is our intrinsic curiosity
that relishes in discovery and thrives in the unknown. Creative expression is our unique story, and it
is our song that wants to be sung.
The best way to describe my creative
theory is to apply it to my process.
Most of my better photographs tend to be from found scenes, rather than
constructed images. I tend to search
for encounters and I rely heavily on visual stimulus, faith and intuition. Upon finding a scene, I explore it, and it
usually takes a while for a scene to reveal itself. When I am in the creative mode, the initial
scene becomes an incomplete gestalt. The
experience of the encounter is felt through sensory memory as language dissipates
through observation. The process of
closure is slowed through questions. This
is the opportunity to stretch the imagination around the ideas of new
perspectives and alternate points of view.
Metaphors, myth and cultural ideas are explored during the encounter. Sometimes deeper meaning is captured, and sometimes
it is not.
The difficult part of creativity is
conveying what was experienced into something the viewer can share. My creative toolbox uses the conscious and
the unconscious. It uses the culmination
of my experience inline with dream, myth, reason and faith. It has technical knowledge and craft along
with poetic expression to will visions into existence. All of these tools work together in the
attempt to create an image capable of speaking to the sensory memories and
emotive feelings in others. I have
maintained that I attempt to include mystery and secrets within my imagery. This allows a connection in which the viewer
can interpret works through the infusion of their own experiences and
imaginations. Mystery speaks to things
unknown, and secrets are things revealed, but not shared. The unknown fuels creativity, and my nature speaks
to creating images through curiosity and exploration. When successful, my imagery sparks the
creative drive in others.
Creativity is not an isolated
function of the psyche solely possessed by artists. Creativity is the forge of human understanding
and expression. It is the system of
thought reflective of our inner nature, and it is limited only by how far one
is willing to learn and express their authentic selves. Angelou was right that everyone has a song to
sing, and creativity is the flicker of life that composes our uniqueness and
lets our songs be sung.
Works Cited
Angelou, Maya. Maya
Angelou Quotes. N.d. Web. 5 Aug 2013. http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/737-a-bird-doesn-t-sing-because-it-has-an-answer-it
Einstein, Albert. “Letter to Jacques
Hadamard.” The Creative Process: A Symposium. Ed. Brewster Ghislen. Berkeley:
University of California Press. 1985. 32-33. Print.
Gerard, R.W. “The Biological Basis of
Imagination.” The Creative Process: A Symposium. Ed. Brewster Ghislen. Berkeley:
University of California Press. 1985. 236-259. Print.
Maslow, Abraham. Toward
a Psychology of Being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 1968. Print.
May, Rollo. The Courage to Create. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 1975.
11-54. Print.
Spender, Stephen. “The Making of a Poem.” The Creative Process: A Symposium. Ed. Brewster Ghislen. Berkeley: University of
California Press. 1985. 113-126. Print.
Valery, Paul. “The Course in Poetics: First Lesson.” The Creative Process: A Symposium. Ed. Brewster Ghislen. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1985. 92-105. Print.
Valery, Paul. “The Course in Poetics: First Lesson.” The Creative Process: A Symposium. Ed. Brewster Ghislen. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1985. 92-105. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment